SOCIAL STRUCTURE OF COGNITION IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF G. W.F. HEGEL AND L. WITTGENSTEIN

Autores

  • Josefina Anna Formanová Charles University in Prague. Faculty of Arts. Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36311/1984-8900.2017.v9n20.11.p174

Palavras-chave:

Social structure, Cognition, Hegel, Wittgenstein

Resumo

The aim of this paper is to give an account of Wittgenstein’s epistemological view in Philosophical Investigations (PI) in the context of Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit (PoS). PoS serves as a model structure through which the conception in PI of cognition is being gradually outlined. After the sketch of Wittgenstein’s account of knowledge in On Certainty compared to Kant’s epistemological conception and Hume’s skeptical doubts, the sole examination of Hegel’s PoS commences. First, I intend to deal with the problem of sense-certainty. It is argued that pure sensory experience without an intrusion of concept cannot grasp any particular object in apprehension. Second, I observe that Hegel’s account of force and understanding introduces the theme of conceptuality. Wittgenstein is being examined simultaneously, on the background of the analysis of Hegel’s dialectical course. It is concluded that both Hegelian and Wittgensteinian conception implies that any kind of knowledge requires some social basis, i.e. that cognition is possible only when language, or conceptuality and propositionality respectively, intervenes. The thesis is shorty compared to John McDowell’s concept of how a human mind approaches the world.12

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

AUDI, R. Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge. Routledge: London, 2003.

BAKER, G.P.; HACKER, P.M.S. Wittgenstein: Understanding and Meaning. Oxford, UK: Wiley- Blackwell, 2009.

DE VRIES, V.A. Hegel’s Theory of Mental Activity: An Introduction to Theoretical Spirit. Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press, 1988.

FUMERTON, R.; HASAN, A. “Foundationalist Theories of Epistemic Justification.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 14 Jun 2010. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justep-foundational/

______.; ______. “Knowledge by Acquaintance vs. Description.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 10 Mar, 2014. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/knowledgeacquaindescrip/

HAMILTON, A. Wittgenstein and On Certainty. Routledge: New York, 2004.

HEGEL, G. W. F. Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by Pinkard, Terry. Cambridge University Press: 2013.

HUME, D. Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford University Press: New York, 1999.

HYPPOLITE, J. Genesis and Structure of Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Northwestern University Press: USA 1974.

KANT, I. Translated by Pluhar, Werner S. Critique of Pure Reason. Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.: USA, 1996.

KRIPKE, S. A. Naming and Necessity. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, 1981.

LYCAN, W. “Representational Theories of Consciousness.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 17 Apr, 2015. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consciousness-representational/MALPAS, J. “Donald Davidson.” 5 May, 2014.

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/davidson/MCDOWELL, J. Mind & World. Harvard University Press: USA, 2000.

Moyal-Sharrock, Daniele. Understanding Wittgenstein’s On Certainty. Palgrave Macmillan: New York, 2004.

PINKARD, T. Hegel’s Phenomenology: The Sociality of Reason. Cambridge University Press: USA, 1994.

PITT, D. “Mental Representation.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 11 Dec, 2012. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mental-representation/

ROCKMORE, T. Cognition: An Introduction to Hegel’sPhenomenology of Spirit. University of California Press: Berkeley, 1997.

RUSSELL, B. The Problems of Philosophy. Oxford University Press: USA, 1997.

SCHWITZGEBEL, E. “Belief.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 24 Mar, 2015.http://plato.stanford.edu/search/searcher.py?query=dispositionalism

WITTGENSTEIN, L. On Certainty. Basil Blackwell: Oxford, 1969. ______. Translated by Anscombe, G. E. M. Philosophical Investigations. Basil Blackwell Ltd.: Oxford, 1986.

______. Tractatus Logico-philosophicus. Routledge: New York, 2002.

Downloads

Publicado

2018-03-15

Edição

Seção

Artigos