Arquivos deslocados
mapeamento de literatura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36311/1981-1640.2019.v13n4.02.p5Palavras-chave:
produção científica, conflitos pela custódia de arquivos, arquivos deslocados, repatriação de arquivosResumo
Este artigo consiste num mapeamento de literatura em torno do tópico “arquivos deslocados”. Um dos problemas verificados consiste na ausência de um quadro conceptual claro, por a terminografia arquivística apresentar diversos termos para denominar um mesmo fenómeno. O objetivo deste artigo consiste em realizar uma prospeção e síntese de literatura em torno das caraterísticas, dimensão e contexto de utilização dos conceitos utilizados. Foram realizadas buscas na base de dados Web of Science (WoS), tendo como critérios de inclusão termos extraídos da terminologia arquivística em inglês e artigos científicos publicados entre 1953 a 2018 em revistas analisadas por pares. Metodologicamente, o artigo combina o mapeamento de literatura com uma revisão de escopo. Dos 160 artigos, foram incluídos 70, produzidos entre 1962 a 2018. Predominam temas associados com a descolonização e secessão, conflito armado e tráfico ilícito, tanto em contexto internacional como intranacional. Prevalecem estudos qualitativos, especialmente análises históricas e estudos de caso. Novos conceitos aparecem, como arquivos coloniais, arquivos confiscados e arquivos expatriados, não considerados pela terminografia arquivística. Para concluir, o conceito de "arquivo deslocado" permanece invisível junto da comunidade arquivística, especialmente lusófona, da qual não se obteve qualquer produção científica sobre o tópico.
Downloads
Não há dados estatísticos.
Métricas
Carregando Métricas ...
Referências
Adams, R. (1939). The Character and Extent of Fugitive Archi-val Material. // The American Archivist. 2:2 (1939) 85–96. doi: 10.17723/aarc.2.2.60156g49p2h31hw9.
Adams, R. (1940). Fugitive archives: a national problem. // Quarterly review: A journal of university perspectives. 46:19 (1940) 217–226. Obtido de https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015071119625eview=1upeseq=296.
Alves, I.; Ramos, M. M. O.; Garcia, M. M., Pereira, M. O. A.; Lomelino, M. P.; Nascimento, P. C. (1993). Diciona?rio de terminologia arquivi?stica. Lisboa: Instituto da Biblioteca Na-cional e do Livro, Organismo de Normalizac?a?o Sectorial pa-ra a Informac?a?o e Documentac?a?o, 1993.
Anderson, D. M. (2011). Mau Mau in the High Court and the «Lost» British Empire Archives: Colonial Conspiracy or Bureaucratic Bungle? // The Journal of Imperial and Com-monwealth History. 39:5 (2011) 699–716. doi: 10.1080/03086534.2011.629082.
Anderson, D. M. (2015). Guilty Secrets: Deceit, Denial, and the Discovery of Kenya’s `Migrated Archive’. // History Workshop Journal. 80: (2015) 142–160. doi: 10.1093/hwj/dbv027.
Aria, M., e Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of In-formetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOI.2017.08.007.
Arksey, H.; O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. // International Journal of So-cial Research Methodology. 8:1 (2005) 19–32. doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616.
Arquivo Nacional. (2005). Dicionário brasileiro de terminologia arquivística. Rio de Janeiro: Arquivo Nacional, 2005.
Auer, L. (1998). Disputed archival claims: analysis of an inter-national survey: a RAMP study. Paris: Unesco, 1998.
Badger, A. (2012). Historians, a legacy of suspicion and the `migrated archives’. // Small Wars e Insurgencies. 23:4–5-SI (2012) 799–807. doi: 10.1080/09592318.2012.709761.
Bailkin, J. (2015). Where Did the Empire Go? Archives and Decolonization in Britain. // The American Historical Re-view. 120:3 (2015) 884–899. doi: 10.1093/ahr/120.3.884.
Baker, L. M. (2008). Unobtrusive Research. // Given, L. M. (ed.). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oaks California: SAGE Publications, 2008. 904–906
Banton, M. (2012a). ‘Lost’ and ‘found’: the concealment and release of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office ‘migrated archives’. // Comma. 2012:1 (2012a) 33–46. doi: 10.3828/comma.2012.1.04.
Banton, M. (2012b). Destroy?‘Migrate’? Conceal? British Stra-tegies for the Disposal of Sensitive Records of Colonial Administrations at Independence. // The Journal of Impe-rial and Commonwealth History. 40:2 (2012b) 321–335.
Barber, S. (2012). Who owns knowledge? Heritage, intellectual property and access in and to the history of Antigua and Barbuda. // Archival Science. 12:1 (2012) 1–17. doi: 10.1007/s10502-011-9141-6.
Barité, M. (2017). Literary warrant. // Birger, H. (ed.). Encyclo-pedia of Knowledge Organization. ISKO. Disponível em https://www.isko.org/cyclo/literary_warrant. (acedido a 2019-11-08).
Barkan, E. (2002). Amending Historical injustices: the restitu-tion of Cultural property – an overview. // Barkan, Elazar; Bush R. (eds.). Claiming the stones/naming the bones: cul-tural property and the negotiation of national and ethnic identity. Los Angeles, CA: Getty Research Institute, 2002. 16–46.
Bastian, J. A. (2006). Reading Colonial Records Through an Archival Lens: The Provenance of Place, Space and Crea-tion. // Archival Science. 6:3–4 (2006) 267–284. doi: 10.1007/s10502-006-9019-1.
Belcher, G.; Boardman, J.; Clair, W. St.; Cornu, M. F.; Brown; M.; Flynn, T.; Wickramasinghe, N. (2016). Cultural Herita-ge Ethics?: Between Theory and Practice. Open Book Pu-blishers, 2016.
Biblioteca Nacional de Portugal. (2010). Normas portuguesas de documentação e informação CT 7. Lisboa: BNP?: IPQ, 2010.
Boardman, J. (2016). ‘National’ Heritage and Scholarship. // Belcher, G.; Boardman, J.; St. Clair, W.; Cornu, M.; Brown, M. F.; Flynn, T., Wickramasinghe, N. (eds.). Cultural Heri-tage Ethics?: Between Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, 2016. 131–134.
Booth, A. (2006). ‘‘Brimful of STARLITE’’: toward standards for reporting. // J Med Lib Assoc. 94:October (2006) 421–430. Obtido de http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1629442etool=pmcentrezerendertype=abstract.
Booth, A.; Sutton, A.; Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. London: SA-GE, 2016.
Boserup, I. (2005). The Manuscript and the Internet: digital repatriation of cultural heritage. // IFLA Journal. 31:2 (2005) 169-173. doi: 10.1177/0340035205054881.
Brower, P. (1963). The United-States Armys Seizure and Ad-ministration of Enemy Records Up to World-War-II. // The American Archivist. 26:2 (1963) 191–207.
Camargo, A. M. de A.; Bellotto, H. L. (eds.). (1996). Dicio-nário de terminologia arquivística. São Paulo: Associação dos Arquivistas Brasileiros, Núcleo Regional de São Paulo; Secretaria de Estado da Cultura, 1996.
Cary, A. (2011). Cary report on release of the colonial adminis-tration files: independent report. 2011.
Chechi, A. (2014). The settlement of international cultural heri-tage disputes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Chen, C. (2017). Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature. // Journal of Data and Information Science. 2:2 (2017) 1–40. doi: 10.1515/jdis-2017-0006.
Coeuré, S. (2017). Cultural Looting and Restitution at the Dawn of the Cold War: The French Recovery Missions in Eastern Europe. // Journal of Contemporary History. 52:3 (2017) 588–606. doi: 10.1177/0022009416658700.
Colquhoun, H. L.; Levac, D.; O’Brien, K. K.; Straus, S.; Tricco, A. C.; Perrier, L.; Moher, D. (2014). Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. // Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 67:12 (2014) 1291–1294. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013.
Conselho Internacional de Arquivos. (2016). Princípios básicos sobre o papel dos arquivistas na defesa dos direitos huma-nos: documento de trabalho do Conselho Internacional de Arquivos. Paris: Conselho Internacional de Arquivos. Dis-ponível em: https://www.ica.org/sites/default/files/ica-hrwg--principios_basicos_sobre_papel_arquivistas_rev fi-nal 07112016_Portuguese.pdf. (acedido a 2019-11-08).
Cooper, C.; Booth, A.; Varley-Campbell, J.; Britten, N.; Garsi-de, R. (2018). Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies. // BMC Medical Research Metho-dology. 18:85 (2018) 2–14. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0545-3.
Corens, L. (2016). Dislocation and record-keeping: the counter archives of the Catholic diaspora. // Past e Present. 230:11 supl. (2016) 269–287. doi: 10.1093/pastj/gtw021.
Cornu, M.; Renold, M.-A. (2010). New Developments in the Restitution of Cultural Property: Alternative Means of Dis-pute Resolution. // International Journal of Cultural Pro-perty. 17:1 (2010) 1–31. doi: 10.1017/S0940739110000044.
Cox, D. (2010). Archives and records in armed conflict: inter-national law and the current debate over iraqi records and archives. // Catholic University Law Review. 59:4 (2010) 1001–1056.
Cox, D. (2011). “Inalienable” archives: Korean royal archives as French property under international law. // International Journal of Cultural Property. 18:4 (2011) 409–423. doi: 10.1017/S0940739111000245.
Cox, D. (2017). Revisiting the Law and Politics of Compromi-se. // Lowry, J. (ed.), Displaced Archives. New York: Routledge, 2017. 196–214.
Cunha, M. B. da; Cavalcanti, C. R. (2008). Diciona?rio de bi-blioteconomia e arquivologia. Brasília: Briquet de Lemos Livros, 2008
Danielson, E. S. (2013). Archives and the Ethics of Replevin. // Journal of Information Ethics. 22:2 (2013). Obtido de https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P3-3619708851/archives-and-the-ethics-of-replevin.
Delva, M. (2018). Decolonizing the Prisons of Cultural Identity: Denominational Archives and Indigenous «Manifestations of Culture». // Toronto Journal of Theology. 34:1 (2018) 3–20. doi: 10.3138/tjt.2017-0016.
Dictionary Working Group of the Society of American Archi-vists. (2018a). alienated record. Disponível em: https://us3.campaign-archi-ve.com/?u=56c4cfbec1ee5b2a284e7e9d6eid=a655c2a745. (acedido a 2019-11-08).
Dictionary Working Group of the Society of American Archi-vists. (2018b). displaced archives. Disponível em: https://us3.campaign-archi-ve.com/?u=56c4cfbec1ee5b2a284e7e9d6eid=1993e03415. (acedido a 2019-11-08).
Dictionary Working Group of the Society of American Archi-vists. (2018c). repatriation. Disponível em: https://mailchi.mp/archivists/word-of-the-week-repatriation-2018-04-17?fbclid=IwAR3lxfQHjJzq_0RgTgVtbFNfDRbpeOrf_noEal9C9ApyN6BqLeRF4OexmCA. (acedido a 2019-11-08).
Duranti, L.; Franks, P. (2015). Encyclopedia of archival scien-ce. Lanham: Rowman e Littlefield, 2015
El Shakry, O. (2015). «History without Documents»: The Vexed Archives of Decolonization in the Middle East. // American Historical Review. 120:3 (2015) 920–934. doi: 10.1093/ahr/120.3.920.
Elkins, C. (2015). Looking beyond Mau Mau: Archiving Vio-lence in the Era of Decolonization. // American Historical Review. 120:3 (2015) 852–868. doi: 10.1093/ahr/120.3.852.
Fishman, J. P. (2010). Locating the International Interest in Intranational Cultural Property Disputes. // Yale Journal of International Law. 35:2 (2010) 347–404.
France. Ministère de l’Intérieur. (1841). Rapport au roi sur les archives départementales et communales. Paris: Imprimerie et Librairie Administratives de Paul Dupont et Cie., 1841.
Frick, C. (2015). Repatriating American film heritage or heritage hoarding? Digital opportunities for traditional film archive policy. // Convergence: The International Journal of Re-search into New Media Technologies. 21:1 (2015) 116–131. doi: 10.1177/1354856514560999.
Genovese, T. R. (2016). Decolonizing Archival Methodology: Combating hegemony and moving towards a collaborative archival environment. // AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples. 12:1 (2016) 32–42. doi: 10.20507/AlterNative.2016.12.1.3.
Glenn, B. (1962). Private records seized by the United-States in wartime - their legal status. // The American Archivist. 25:4 (1962) 399–405.
Grant, M. J.; Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. // Health Information e Libraries Journal. 26:2 (2009) 91–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.
Grimsted, P. (1971). Archives in the Soviet Union: Their Orga-nization and the Problem of Access. // The American Ar-chivist. 34:1 (1971) 27–41. doi: 10.17723/aarc.34.1.0l416hv158h31057.
Grimsted, P. (1991). «Perestroika» in the Archives? Further Efforts at Soviet Archival Reform. // The American Archi-vist. 54:1 (1991) 70–95. doi: 10.17723/aarc.54.1.60h14p374l379289.
Grimsted, P. K. (1982). The Fate of Early Records in Lviv Archives: Documentation from Western Ukraine under Po-lish Rule (Fifteenth Century to 1772). // The Slavonic and East European Review. 60:3 (1982) 321–346. doi: 10.2307/4208539.
Grimsted, P. K. (1987). The archival legacy of Soviet Ukraine: Problems of tracing the documentary records of a divided nation. // Cahiers du Monde Russe. 28:1 (1987) 95–108. Obtido de https://www.persee.fr/doc/cmr_0008-0160_1987_num_28_1_2103.
Grimsted, P. K. (1991). The Fate of Ukrainian Cultural Treasu-res During World War II: The Plunder of Archives, Libra-ries, and Museums under the Third Reich. // Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas. 39:1 (1991) 53–80. doi: 10.2307/41048536.
Grimsted, P. K. (1992). Beyond Perestroika - Soviet-area archi-ves after the August Coup. // The American Archivist. 55:1 (1992) 94–124.
Grimsted, P. K. (1993a). Archival Rossica/Sovietica abroad?: Provenance or pertinence, bibliographic and descriptive needs. // Cahiers du Monde Russe. 34:3 (1993a) 431–479. Obtido de https://www.persee.fr/doc/cmr_0008-0160_1993_num_34_3_2364.
Grimsted, P. K. (1993b). Russian Archives in Transition: Caught Between Political Crossfire and Economic Crisis. // The American Archivist. 56:4 (1993b) 614–662. doi: 10.17723/aarc.56.4.40u60mg4238475r6.
Grimsted, P. K. (2001). Twice plundered or «twice saved»? Identifying Russia’s «trophy» archives and the loot of the (Nazi) Reich-Security-Main-Office. // Holocaust and Geno-cide Studies. 15:2 (2001) 191–244. doi: 10.1093/hgs/15.2.191
Grimsted, P. K. (2005). Roads to Ratibor: Library and archival plunder by the Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg. // Holo-caust and Genocide Studies. 19:3 (2005) 390–458. doi: 10.1093/hgs/dci041.
Grimsted, P. K. (2006). The postwar fate of Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg archival and library plunder, and the dispersal of ERR records. // Holocaust and Genocide Stu-dies. 20:2 (2006) 278–308. doi: 10.1093/hgs/dcl005
Grimsted, P. K. (2010a). Legalizing «Compensation» and the Spoils of War: The Russian Law on Displaced Cultural Va-luables and the Manipulation of Historical Memory. // In-ternational Journal of Cultural Property. 17:43497 (2010a) 217–255. doi: 10.1017/S094073911000010X
Grimsted, P. K. (2010b). Why Do Captured Archives Go Ho-me? Restitution Achievements under the Russian Law. // International Journal of Cultural Property. 17:43497 (2010b) 291–333. doi: 10.1017/S0940739110000123
Gunderson, F.; Lancefield, R. C.; Woods, B. (eds.). (2018). The Oxford Handbook of Musical Repatriation. The Ox-ford Handbook of Musical Repatriation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018
Haggan, M. (2004). Research paper titles in literature, linguis-tics and science: Dimensions of attraction. // Journal of Pragmatics. 36:2 (2004) 293–317. doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00090-0
Heuman, J. (2013). Unpacking the gift: negotiating property and custody in archival hardcore blogs. // Popular Music. 32:2 (2013) 177–195. doi: 10.1017/S026114301300010X
Hilder, T. R. (2012). Repatriation, Revival and Transmission: The Politics of a Sami Musical Heritage. // Ethnomusicolo-gy Forum. 21:2-SI (2012) 161–179. doi: 10.1080/17411912.2012.689473
Hill, C. G. (2017). Seeds as Ancestors, Seeds as Archives: Seed Sovereignty and the Politics of Repatriation to Native Peo-ples. // American Indian Culture and Research Journal. 41:3-SI (2017) 93–112. doi: 10.17953/aicrj.41.3.hill
Hill, M. R. (1993). Archival strategies and techniques. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage, 1993
Iacovino, L. (2010). Rethinking archival, ethical and legal fra-meworks for records of Indigenous Australian communi-ties: a participant relationship model of rights and respon-sibilities. // Archival Science. 10:4 (2010) 353–372. doi: 10.1007/s10502-010-9120-3
INRA. (2017). Cortext Manager - Cortext. Disponível em: https://www.cortext.net/projects/cortext-manager/. (acedido a 2019-11-08)
International Council on Archives. (1964). Elsevier’s lexicon of archive terminology?: French, English, German, Spanish, Italian, Dutch: comp. and arranged on a systematic basis. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1964
International Council on Archives. (1984). Dictionary of archi-val terminology?: English and French; with equivalents in Dutch, German, Italian, Russian, and Spanish. München: New York: K.G. Saur, 1984
International Council on Archives. (1995). The View of the Archival Community on the Settling of Disputed Claims: Position Paper Adopted by the Executive Committee of the International Council on Archives, Guangzhou, China, 10–13 April 1995. ICA/CIA. Disponível em: https://www.ica.org/sites/default/files/EB_1995_paper_archival-claims_EN.pdf. (acedido a 2019-11-08)
International Council on Archives. (2004). DAT III: Dictionary of archival terminology. Disponível em: https://internet.archivschule.uni-marburg.de/datiii/index.html. (acedido a 2019-11-08)
International Council on Archives. (2005). Reference Dossier on Archival Claims. // H. Bastien (Ed.). Proceedings of the twenty-nineth, thirtieh and thirty first International Confe-rence of the Round Table on Archives. Special Issue JANUS. Dordrecht 1998.
International Council on Archives. (2013). Multilingual Archi-val Terminology. Disponível em: http://www.ciscra.org/mat/mat. (acedido a 2019-11-08)
International Council on Archives. (2016). Basic Principles on the role of Archivists and Records Managers in support of Human Rights, International Council on Archives § (2016). Disponível em: https://www.ica.org/en/basic-principles-role-archivists-and-records-managers-support-human-rights. (acedido a 2019-11-08)
Jakubowski, A. (2015). State succession in cultural property. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015
Kahunde, S. (2012). Repatriating Archival Sound Recordings to Revive Traditions: The Role of the Klaus Wachsmann Re-cordings in the Revival of the Royal Music of Bunyoro-Kitara, Uganda. // Ethnomusicology Forum. 21:2-SI (2012) 197–219. doi: 10.1080/17411912.2012.689471
Karabinos, M. (2013). Displaced Archives, Displaced History: Recovering the Seized Archives of Indonesia. // Bijdragen tot de taal-. land- en volkenkunde / Journal of the Humani-ties and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia. 169:43499 (2013) 279–294. doi: 10.1163/22134379-12340027
Karabinos, M. (2015). The Djogdja Documenten: the Dutch-Indonesian relationship following independence through an archival lens. // Information e Culture. 50:3 (2015) 372–391. doi: 10.7560/IC50304
Karabinos, M. (2018). In the shadows of the continuum: testing the records continuum model through the Foreign and Commonwealth Office ‘Migrated Archives’. // Archival Science. 18:3 (2018) 207–224. doi: 10.1007/s10502-018-9292-9
Kecskeméti, C. (1977). Archival claims; preliminary study on the principles and criteria to be applied in negotiations (PGI-77/WS/1). Paris: UNESCO, 1977
Kecskeméti, C. (1985). Contested records - The Legal Status of National Archives. // UNESCO COURIER. :2 (1985) 9–11.
Kecskeméti, C. (1992). Displaced european archives - is it time for a postwar settlement. // The American Archivist. 55:1 (1992) 132–140.
Kila, J.; Balcells, M. (2015). Conclusion: Cultural Property Crime. // Kila, J.; Balcells, M. (eds.). Cultural property cri-me?: an overview and analysis on contemporary perspecti-ves and trends. Leiden?; Boston: Brill, 2015. 366–370
King, J. L. (1999). Cultural Property and National Sovereignty. // Messenger, P. M. (ed.). The ethics of collecting cultural property?: whose culture??: whose property? Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, 1999. 199-208
Kowalski, W. (2005). Types of Claims for Recovery of Lost Cultural Property. // Museum International. 57:4 (2005) 85–102. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0033.2005.00543.x
Kuprecht, K. (2016). Indigenous peoples’ cultural property claims. Cham: Springer, 2016
Lancefield, R. C. (1998). Musical Traces’ Retraceable Paths: The Repatriation of Recorded Sound. // Journal of Folklore Research. 35:1 (1998) 47–68. doi: 10.2307/3814785
Layton, R.; Thomas, J.; Stone, P. G. (2011). Introduction: the destruction and conservation of cultural property. Em Des-truction and conservation of cultural property (pp. 1–22). London: Routledge, 2011. 17-37
Levac, D.; Colquhoun, H.; O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. // Implementation Science. 5:69 (2010) 2–9. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
Leventhal, R. M.; Daniels, B. I. (2012). Orphaned Objects, Ethical Standards, and the Acquisition of Antiquities. // DePaul Journal of Art. Technology and Intellectual Property Law. 23: (2012) 339–361. Obtido de https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/dael23eid=363ediv=ecollection=
Lovering, T. (2009). Expatriate Archives. // Archives: The Journal of the British Records Association. 24:121 (2009) 1–5.
Lovering, T. (2017). Expatriate Archives Revisited. // Lowry, J. (ed.). Displaced Archives. New York: Routledge, 2017. 86–100
Lowry, J. (2017b). Introduction: displaced archives. // Lowry, J. (ed.), Displaced archives. London?; New York: Routled-ge, 2017. 1–10
Lowry, J. (2019). Radical empathy, the imaginary and affect in (post)colonial records: how to break out of international stalemates on displaced archives. // Archival Science. 19: (2019) 1–19. doi: 10.1007/s10502-019-09305-z
Lowry, J. (Ed.). (2017a). Displaced archives. London: Routled-ge, 2017
Maaba, B. B. (2008). Challenges to Repatriation and Preserva-tion of Tangible Heritage in South Africa: Black Art and the Experiences of the Ifa Lethu Foundation. // South African Historical Journal. 60:3 (2008) 500–513. doi: 10.1080/02582470802417557
Martín-Martín, A.; Orduna-Malea, E.; Thelwall, M.; López-Cózar, E. D. (2018). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. // Journal of Informetrics. 12:4 (2018) 1160–1177. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002
Mattern, E. (2016). A six-stage process for recovery of public records: replevin and the state of North Carolina. // Archi-val Science. 16:2 (2016) 195–212. doi: 10.1007/s10502-015-9241-9
Melamed, E. (2012). The fate of the archives of the Kiev Insti-tute of Jewish Proletarian Culture: puzzles and discoveries. // East European Jewish Affairs. 42:2 (2012) 99–110. doi: 10.1080/13501674.2012.699206
Merryman, J. H. (1994). The Nation and the Object. // Interna-tional Journal of Cultural Property. 3:1 (1994) 61–76. doi: 10.1017/S094073919400007X
Mnjama, N. M. (2007). A review of ESARBICA resolutions 1969-2005. // African Journal of Library. Archives and In-formation Science. 17:1 (2007) 23–32.
Montgomery, B. P. (2011). Immortality in the Secret Police Files: The Iraq Memory Foundation and the Baath Party Archive. // International Journal of Cultural Property. 18:3 (2011) 309–336. doi: 10.1017/S094073911100018X
Montgomery, B. P. (2013). Rescue or return: the fate of the Iraqi Jewish archive. // International Journal of Cultural Property. 20:2 (2013) 175–200. doi: 10.1017/S0940739113000040
Montgomery, B. P. (2014). US Seizure, Exploitation, and Resti-tution of Saddam Hussein’s Archive of Atrocity. // Journal of American Studies. 48:2 (2014) 559–593. doi: 10.1017/S0021875813002004
Montgomery, B. P. (2015). The Rape of Kuwait’s National Memory. // International Journal of Cultural Property. 22:1 (2015) 61–84. doi: 10.1017/S0940739115000053
Munn, Z.; Peters, M. D. J.; Stern, C.; Tufanaru, C.; McArthur, A.; Aromataris, E. (2018a). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. // BMC Medical Research Methodology. 18:143 (2018a) 2–7. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
Nagel, R. (Ed.). (1989). Dicionário de termos arquivísticos: subsídios para uma terminologia arquivística brasileira. Bonn?: Salvador: Deutsche Stiftung für internationale Entwicklung?: Universidade Federal da Bahia, 1989
Namhila, E. N. (2016). Content and use of colonial archives: an under-researched issue. // Archival Science. 16:2 (2016) 111–123. doi: 10.1007/s10502-014-9234-0
Nannyonga-Tamusuza, S.; Weintraub, A. N. (2012). The Au-dible Future: Reimagining the Role of Sound Archives and Sound Repatriation in Uganda. // Ethnomusicology. 56:2 (2012) 206–233.
Nemeth, E. (2014). Plunderer and Protector of Cultural Pro-perty: Security-Intelligence Services Shape the Strategic Va-lue of Art. // Nemeth, E. (ed.). Cultural security?: evaluating the power of culture in international affairs. London: Impe-rial College Press, 2014. 42
Ngoepe, M.; Netshakhuma, S. (2018). Archives in the tren-ches: repatriation of African National Congress liberation archives in diaspora to South Africa. // Archival Science. 18:1 (2018) 51–71. doi: 10.1007/s10502-018-9284-9
Niessen, J. P. (2018). Heritage and Repatriation in the History of Habsburg and Hungarian Archives. // Hungarian Cultu-ral Studies. 11: (2018) 136–143. doi: 10.5195/ahea.2018.327
Novic, E. (2016). The concept of cultural genocide?: an interna-tional law perspective. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2016
O’Keefe, R. (2006). The protection of cultural property in ar-med conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006
O’Neill, J. E. (1979). Replevin: A Public Archivist’s Perspecti-ve. // College e Research Libraries. 40:1 (1979) 26–30. doi: 10.5860/crl_40_01_26
Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., e Elmagarmid, A. (2016). Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic re-views. // Systematic Reviews, 5:1 (2016), 210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4. (acedido a 2019-11-08)
Pearce-Moses, R. (2005). A glossary of archival and records terminology. Chicago : Society of American Archivists, c2005
Pham, M. T.; Raji?, A.; Greig, J. D.; Sargeant, J. M.; Papadopou-los, A.; McEwen, S. A. (2014). A scoping review of sco-ping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. // Research Synthesis Methods. 5:4 (2014) 371–385. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1123
Phillips, D. (2016). The ‘Migrated Archives’ and a Forgotten Corner of Empire: The British Borneo Territories. // The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History. 44:6 (2016) 1001–1019. doi: 10.1080/03086534.2016.1251557
Porter, M. F. (1980). An algorithm for suffix stripping. // Pro-gram. 14:3 (1980) 130–137. doi: 10.1108/eb046814
Porter, M., e Boulton, R. (2002). Snowball. Disponível em: https://snowballstem.org/. (acedido a 2019-11-08)
Portugal. Ministério da Ciência Tecnologia e Ensino Superior. (2013). Renates - Registo Nacional de Teses e Dissertações. Disponível em: https://renates2.dgeec.mec.pt/. (acedido a 2019-11-08)
Punzalan, R. (2014). Understanding Virtual Reunification. // The Library Quarterly. 84:3 (2014) 294–323. doi: 10.1086/676489
R Core Team. (2013). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Disponível em: https://www.r-project.org/. (acedido a 2019-11-08)
Radeljic, B. (2015). Complete and Incomplete Archives: An Analysis of Archival Material Documenting European Community?Yugoslav Relations. // The Historian. 77:1 (2015) 80–99. doi: 10.1111/hisn.12057
Rawlings, G. (2015). Lost Files , Forgotten Papers and Colonial Disclosures?: The «Migrated Archives» and the Pacific , 1963 – 2013. // The Journal of Pacific History. 50:2 (2015) 189–212. doi: 10.1080/00223344.2015.1048585
Redman, T. (1979). The repatriation of Pound, 1939-1942: a view from the archives. // Paideuma: Modern and Contem-porary Poetry and Poetics. 8:3 (1979) 447–457.
Rhoads, J. (1966). Alienation and Thievery: Archival Problems. // The American Archivist. 29:2 (1966) 197–208. doi: 10.17723/aarc.29.2.510581828404555q
Ribeiro, F. (2011). A arquivística como disciplina aplicada no campo da ciência da informação. // Perspectivas em gestão e conhecimento. 1:1 (2011) 59–73. Obtido de http://periodicos.ufpb.br/index.php/pgc/article/view/9887
Ribeiro, F. (2013). La archivística como disciplina aplicada en el campo de la ciencia de la información (CI). // Códices. 9:1 (2013) 83–105. Obtido de http://eprints.rclis.org/19858
Ribeiro, F. A. (1998). O acesso à informação nos arquivos. Universidade do Porto. 1998
Robinson, H. (2012). Remembering things differently: mu-seums, libraries and archives as memory institutions and the implications for convergence. // Museum Management and Curatorship. 27:4 (2012) 413–429. doi: 10.1080/09647775.2012.720188
Sato, S. (2017). «Operation Legacy»: Britain’s Destruction and Concealment of Colonial Records Worldwide. // The Jour-nal of Imperial and Commonwealth History. 45:4 (2017) 697–719. doi: 10.1080/03086534.2017.1294256
Schenkolewski-Kroll, S. (2016). Jewish archives and archival documents: Israel and the Diaspora. // Archival Science. 16:3 (2016) 309–326. doi: 10.1007/s10502-015-9249-1
SCImago. (2019). SJR — SCImago Journal e Country Rank [Portal]. Disponível em: https://www.scimagojr.com/. (ace-dido a 2019-11-08)
Scovazzi, T. (2014). Repatriation and Restitution of Cultural Property: Relevant Rules of International Law. // Smith, C. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2014. 6318–6324
Sela, R. (2018a). «Imprisoned Photographs’’’: The Looted Archive of Photo Rissas (Rassas) - Ibrahim and Chalil (Khalil) Rissas». // Intermédialités.:32 (2018a). doi: 10.7202/1058469ar
Sela, R. (2018b). The Genealogy of Colonial Plunder and Era-sure - Israel’s Control over Palestinian Archives. // Social Semiotics. 28:2 (2018b) 201–229. doi: 10.1080/10350330.2017.1291140
Shepard, T. (2015). «Of Sovereignty»: Disputed Archives, «wholly Modern» Archives, and the Post-Decolonization French and Algerian Republics, 1962-2012. // American Historical Review.120:3 (2015) 869–883. doi: 10.1093/ahr/120.3.869
Silverman, H. (2011). Contested Cultural Heritage: A Selective Historiography. // Silverman H. (ed.). Contested Cultural Heritage. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2011. 1-49
Sinkoff, N. (2016). From the archives: Lucy S. Dawidowicz and the restitution of Jewish cultural property. // American Jewish History. 100:1 (2016) 117-147. doi: 10.1353/ajh.2016.0009
Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies?: research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). London?; Dunedin N.Z.: Zed Books, 2012
Spivak, G. C. (1999). A critique of postcolonial reason?: toward a history of the vanishing present. Cambridge, Mass.: Har-vard University Press, 1999
Stamatoudi, I. (2011). Cultural Property Law and Restitution. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011
Stoler, A. L. (2002). Colonial Archives and the Arts of Gover-nance. // Archival Science. 2: (2002) 87–109.
Stoler, A. L. (2008). Along the archival grain?: thinking through colonial ontologies. Princeton, N.J.; Woodstock: Princeton University Press, 2008
Stoler, A. L. (2009). Along the archival grain?: epistemic an-xieties and colonial common sense. Princeton University Press, 2009
Tas?delen, A. (2016). The return of cultural artefacts?: hard and soft law approaches. Cham: Springer International Publis-hing, 2016
Toman, J. (1996). The Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict: Commentary on the Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Ar-med Conflict and its Protocol, signed on 14 May 1954 in The Hague, and on other instruments of inter. Brookfield: Dartmouth Publishing Company, 1996
Treloyn, S.; Emberly, A. (2013). Sustaining Traditions: Ethnomusicological Collections, Access and Sustainability in Australia. // Musicology Australia. 35:2 (2013) 159–177. doi: 10.1080/08145857.2013.844473
Treloyn, S.; Martin, M. D.; Charles, R. G. (2016). Cultural precedents for the repatriation of legacy song records to communities of origin. // Australian Aboriginal Studies Journal. :2 (2016) 94–103.
Tricco, A. C.; Lillie, E.; Zarin, W.; O’Brien, K. K.; Colquhoun, H.; Levac, D.; Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explana-tion. // Annals of Internal Medicine. 169:7 (2018) 467–473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850
Trundle, C. (2011). Searching for Culpability in the Archives: Commonwealth Nuclear Test Veterans’ Claims for Com-pensation. // History and Anthropology. 22:4 (2011) 497–512. doi: 10.1080/02757206.2011.626773
Turku, H. (2018). Cultural Property as a Weapon of War. // The Destruction of Cultural Property as a Weapon of War. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. 1-25
UNESCO. (1954). Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict with Regulations for the Execution of the Convention, The Hague, 14 May 1954 (1954).. (acedido a 2019-11-08)
Vallier, J. (2010). Sound Archiving Close to Home: Why Com-munity Partnerships Matter. // Notes. 67:1 (2010) 39–49.
Ventresca, M. J.; Mohr, J. W. (2017). Archival Research Met-hods. // Baum, J. A. C. (ed.). The Blackwell Companion to Organizations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 2017. 805-828
Watkins, J. (2009). Cultural Nationalists, Internationalists, and “Intra-nationalists’’’: Who’s Right and Whose Right?”. // International Journal of Cultural Property. 12:1 (2009) 78–94. doi: doi.org/10.1017/S0940739105999992
Winn, S. R. (2015). Ethics of Access in Displaced Archives. // Provenance. Journal of the Society of Georgia Archivists. 33:1 (2015) 5.
Wurl, J. (2005). Documenting Displacement: The Migration of Archival Sources From Post-WW II East European Emigre Groups. // Archival Science. 5:1 (2005) 79–92. doi: 10.1007/s10502-005-5763-x
Zeidler, K. (2016). Restitution of Cultural Property: A Hard Case - Theory of Argumentation - Philosophy of Law. War-saw : Gdan?sk University Press, 2016.
Adams, R. (1940). Fugitive archives: a national problem. // Quarterly review: A journal of university perspectives. 46:19 (1940) 217–226. Obtido de https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015071119625eview=1upeseq=296.
Alves, I.; Ramos, M. M. O.; Garcia, M. M., Pereira, M. O. A.; Lomelino, M. P.; Nascimento, P. C. (1993). Diciona?rio de terminologia arquivi?stica. Lisboa: Instituto da Biblioteca Na-cional e do Livro, Organismo de Normalizac?a?o Sectorial pa-ra a Informac?a?o e Documentac?a?o, 1993.
Anderson, D. M. (2011). Mau Mau in the High Court and the «Lost» British Empire Archives: Colonial Conspiracy or Bureaucratic Bungle? // The Journal of Imperial and Com-monwealth History. 39:5 (2011) 699–716. doi: 10.1080/03086534.2011.629082.
Anderson, D. M. (2015). Guilty Secrets: Deceit, Denial, and the Discovery of Kenya’s `Migrated Archive’. // History Workshop Journal. 80: (2015) 142–160. doi: 10.1093/hwj/dbv027.
Aria, M., e Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of In-formetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOI.2017.08.007.
Arksey, H.; O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. // International Journal of So-cial Research Methodology. 8:1 (2005) 19–32. doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616.
Arquivo Nacional. (2005). Dicionário brasileiro de terminologia arquivística. Rio de Janeiro: Arquivo Nacional, 2005.
Auer, L. (1998). Disputed archival claims: analysis of an inter-national survey: a RAMP study. Paris: Unesco, 1998.
Badger, A. (2012). Historians, a legacy of suspicion and the `migrated archives’. // Small Wars e Insurgencies. 23:4–5-SI (2012) 799–807. doi: 10.1080/09592318.2012.709761.
Bailkin, J. (2015). Where Did the Empire Go? Archives and Decolonization in Britain. // The American Historical Re-view. 120:3 (2015) 884–899. doi: 10.1093/ahr/120.3.884.
Baker, L. M. (2008). Unobtrusive Research. // Given, L. M. (ed.). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oaks California: SAGE Publications, 2008. 904–906
Banton, M. (2012a). ‘Lost’ and ‘found’: the concealment and release of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office ‘migrated archives’. // Comma. 2012:1 (2012a) 33–46. doi: 10.3828/comma.2012.1.04.
Banton, M. (2012b). Destroy?‘Migrate’? Conceal? British Stra-tegies for the Disposal of Sensitive Records of Colonial Administrations at Independence. // The Journal of Impe-rial and Commonwealth History. 40:2 (2012b) 321–335.
Barber, S. (2012). Who owns knowledge? Heritage, intellectual property and access in and to the history of Antigua and Barbuda. // Archival Science. 12:1 (2012) 1–17. doi: 10.1007/s10502-011-9141-6.
Barité, M. (2017). Literary warrant. // Birger, H. (ed.). Encyclo-pedia of Knowledge Organization. ISKO. Disponível em https://www.isko.org/cyclo/literary_warrant. (acedido a 2019-11-08).
Barkan, E. (2002). Amending Historical injustices: the restitu-tion of Cultural property – an overview. // Barkan, Elazar; Bush R. (eds.). Claiming the stones/naming the bones: cul-tural property and the negotiation of national and ethnic identity. Los Angeles, CA: Getty Research Institute, 2002. 16–46.
Bastian, J. A. (2006). Reading Colonial Records Through an Archival Lens: The Provenance of Place, Space and Crea-tion. // Archival Science. 6:3–4 (2006) 267–284. doi: 10.1007/s10502-006-9019-1.
Belcher, G.; Boardman, J.; Clair, W. St.; Cornu, M. F.; Brown; M.; Flynn, T.; Wickramasinghe, N. (2016). Cultural Herita-ge Ethics?: Between Theory and Practice. Open Book Pu-blishers, 2016.
Biblioteca Nacional de Portugal. (2010). Normas portuguesas de documentação e informação CT 7. Lisboa: BNP?: IPQ, 2010.
Boardman, J. (2016). ‘National’ Heritage and Scholarship. // Belcher, G.; Boardman, J.; St. Clair, W.; Cornu, M.; Brown, M. F.; Flynn, T., Wickramasinghe, N. (eds.). Cultural Heri-tage Ethics?: Between Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, 2016. 131–134.
Booth, A. (2006). ‘‘Brimful of STARLITE’’: toward standards for reporting. // J Med Lib Assoc. 94:October (2006) 421–430. Obtido de http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1629442etool=pmcentrezerendertype=abstract.
Booth, A.; Sutton, A.; Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. London: SA-GE, 2016.
Boserup, I. (2005). The Manuscript and the Internet: digital repatriation of cultural heritage. // IFLA Journal. 31:2 (2005) 169-173. doi: 10.1177/0340035205054881.
Brower, P. (1963). The United-States Armys Seizure and Ad-ministration of Enemy Records Up to World-War-II. // The American Archivist. 26:2 (1963) 191–207.
Camargo, A. M. de A.; Bellotto, H. L. (eds.). (1996). Dicio-nário de terminologia arquivística. São Paulo: Associação dos Arquivistas Brasileiros, Núcleo Regional de São Paulo; Secretaria de Estado da Cultura, 1996.
Cary, A. (2011). Cary report on release of the colonial adminis-tration files: independent report. 2011.
Chechi, A. (2014). The settlement of international cultural heri-tage disputes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Chen, C. (2017). Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature. // Journal of Data and Information Science. 2:2 (2017) 1–40. doi: 10.1515/jdis-2017-0006.
Coeuré, S. (2017). Cultural Looting and Restitution at the Dawn of the Cold War: The French Recovery Missions in Eastern Europe. // Journal of Contemporary History. 52:3 (2017) 588–606. doi: 10.1177/0022009416658700.
Colquhoun, H. L.; Levac, D.; O’Brien, K. K.; Straus, S.; Tricco, A. C.; Perrier, L.; Moher, D. (2014). Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. // Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 67:12 (2014) 1291–1294. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013.
Conselho Internacional de Arquivos. (2016). Princípios básicos sobre o papel dos arquivistas na defesa dos direitos huma-nos: documento de trabalho do Conselho Internacional de Arquivos. Paris: Conselho Internacional de Arquivos. Dis-ponível em: https://www.ica.org/sites/default/files/ica-hrwg--principios_basicos_sobre_papel_arquivistas_rev fi-nal 07112016_Portuguese.pdf. (acedido a 2019-11-08).
Cooper, C.; Booth, A.; Varley-Campbell, J.; Britten, N.; Garsi-de, R. (2018). Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies. // BMC Medical Research Metho-dology. 18:85 (2018) 2–14. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0545-3.
Corens, L. (2016). Dislocation and record-keeping: the counter archives of the Catholic diaspora. // Past e Present. 230:11 supl. (2016) 269–287. doi: 10.1093/pastj/gtw021.
Cornu, M.; Renold, M.-A. (2010). New Developments in the Restitution of Cultural Property: Alternative Means of Dis-pute Resolution. // International Journal of Cultural Pro-perty. 17:1 (2010) 1–31. doi: 10.1017/S0940739110000044.
Cox, D. (2010). Archives and records in armed conflict: inter-national law and the current debate over iraqi records and archives. // Catholic University Law Review. 59:4 (2010) 1001–1056.
Cox, D. (2011). “Inalienable” archives: Korean royal archives as French property under international law. // International Journal of Cultural Property. 18:4 (2011) 409–423. doi: 10.1017/S0940739111000245.
Cox, D. (2017). Revisiting the Law and Politics of Compromi-se. // Lowry, J. (ed.), Displaced Archives. New York: Routledge, 2017. 196–214.
Cunha, M. B. da; Cavalcanti, C. R. (2008). Diciona?rio de bi-blioteconomia e arquivologia. Brasília: Briquet de Lemos Livros, 2008
Danielson, E. S. (2013). Archives and the Ethics of Replevin. // Journal of Information Ethics. 22:2 (2013). Obtido de https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P3-3619708851/archives-and-the-ethics-of-replevin.
Delva, M. (2018). Decolonizing the Prisons of Cultural Identity: Denominational Archives and Indigenous «Manifestations of Culture». // Toronto Journal of Theology. 34:1 (2018) 3–20. doi: 10.3138/tjt.2017-0016.
Dictionary Working Group of the Society of American Archi-vists. (2018a). alienated record. Disponível em: https://us3.campaign-archi-ve.com/?u=56c4cfbec1ee5b2a284e7e9d6eid=a655c2a745. (acedido a 2019-11-08).
Dictionary Working Group of the Society of American Archi-vists. (2018b). displaced archives. Disponível em: https://us3.campaign-archi-ve.com/?u=56c4cfbec1ee5b2a284e7e9d6eid=1993e03415. (acedido a 2019-11-08).
Dictionary Working Group of the Society of American Archi-vists. (2018c). repatriation. Disponível em: https://mailchi.mp/archivists/word-of-the-week-repatriation-2018-04-17?fbclid=IwAR3lxfQHjJzq_0RgTgVtbFNfDRbpeOrf_noEal9C9ApyN6BqLeRF4OexmCA. (acedido a 2019-11-08).
Duranti, L.; Franks, P. (2015). Encyclopedia of archival scien-ce. Lanham: Rowman e Littlefield, 2015
El Shakry, O. (2015). «History without Documents»: The Vexed Archives of Decolonization in the Middle East. // American Historical Review. 120:3 (2015) 920–934. doi: 10.1093/ahr/120.3.920.
Elkins, C. (2015). Looking beyond Mau Mau: Archiving Vio-lence in the Era of Decolonization. // American Historical Review. 120:3 (2015) 852–868. doi: 10.1093/ahr/120.3.852.
Fishman, J. P. (2010). Locating the International Interest in Intranational Cultural Property Disputes. // Yale Journal of International Law. 35:2 (2010) 347–404.
France. Ministère de l’Intérieur. (1841). Rapport au roi sur les archives départementales et communales. Paris: Imprimerie et Librairie Administratives de Paul Dupont et Cie., 1841.
Frick, C. (2015). Repatriating American film heritage or heritage hoarding? Digital opportunities for traditional film archive policy. // Convergence: The International Journal of Re-search into New Media Technologies. 21:1 (2015) 116–131. doi: 10.1177/1354856514560999.
Genovese, T. R. (2016). Decolonizing Archival Methodology: Combating hegemony and moving towards a collaborative archival environment. // AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples. 12:1 (2016) 32–42. doi: 10.20507/AlterNative.2016.12.1.3.
Glenn, B. (1962). Private records seized by the United-States in wartime - their legal status. // The American Archivist. 25:4 (1962) 399–405.
Grant, M. J.; Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. // Health Information e Libraries Journal. 26:2 (2009) 91–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.
Grimsted, P. (1971). Archives in the Soviet Union: Their Orga-nization and the Problem of Access. // The American Ar-chivist. 34:1 (1971) 27–41. doi: 10.17723/aarc.34.1.0l416hv158h31057.
Grimsted, P. (1991). «Perestroika» in the Archives? Further Efforts at Soviet Archival Reform. // The American Archi-vist. 54:1 (1991) 70–95. doi: 10.17723/aarc.54.1.60h14p374l379289.
Grimsted, P. K. (1982). The Fate of Early Records in Lviv Archives: Documentation from Western Ukraine under Po-lish Rule (Fifteenth Century to 1772). // The Slavonic and East European Review. 60:3 (1982) 321–346. doi: 10.2307/4208539.
Grimsted, P. K. (1987). The archival legacy of Soviet Ukraine: Problems of tracing the documentary records of a divided nation. // Cahiers du Monde Russe. 28:1 (1987) 95–108. Obtido de https://www.persee.fr/doc/cmr_0008-0160_1987_num_28_1_2103.
Grimsted, P. K. (1991). The Fate of Ukrainian Cultural Treasu-res During World War II: The Plunder of Archives, Libra-ries, and Museums under the Third Reich. // Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas. 39:1 (1991) 53–80. doi: 10.2307/41048536.
Grimsted, P. K. (1992). Beyond Perestroika - Soviet-area archi-ves after the August Coup. // The American Archivist. 55:1 (1992) 94–124.
Grimsted, P. K. (1993a). Archival Rossica/Sovietica abroad?: Provenance or pertinence, bibliographic and descriptive needs. // Cahiers du Monde Russe. 34:3 (1993a) 431–479. Obtido de https://www.persee.fr/doc/cmr_0008-0160_1993_num_34_3_2364.
Grimsted, P. K. (1993b). Russian Archives in Transition: Caught Between Political Crossfire and Economic Crisis. // The American Archivist. 56:4 (1993b) 614–662. doi: 10.17723/aarc.56.4.40u60mg4238475r6.
Grimsted, P. K. (2001). Twice plundered or «twice saved»? Identifying Russia’s «trophy» archives and the loot of the (Nazi) Reich-Security-Main-Office. // Holocaust and Geno-cide Studies. 15:2 (2001) 191–244. doi: 10.1093/hgs/15.2.191
Grimsted, P. K. (2005). Roads to Ratibor: Library and archival plunder by the Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg. // Holo-caust and Genocide Studies. 19:3 (2005) 390–458. doi: 10.1093/hgs/dci041.
Grimsted, P. K. (2006). The postwar fate of Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg archival and library plunder, and the dispersal of ERR records. // Holocaust and Genocide Stu-dies. 20:2 (2006) 278–308. doi: 10.1093/hgs/dcl005
Grimsted, P. K. (2010a). Legalizing «Compensation» and the Spoils of War: The Russian Law on Displaced Cultural Va-luables and the Manipulation of Historical Memory. // In-ternational Journal of Cultural Property. 17:43497 (2010a) 217–255. doi: 10.1017/S094073911000010X
Grimsted, P. K. (2010b). Why Do Captured Archives Go Ho-me? Restitution Achievements under the Russian Law. // International Journal of Cultural Property. 17:43497 (2010b) 291–333. doi: 10.1017/S0940739110000123
Gunderson, F.; Lancefield, R. C.; Woods, B. (eds.). (2018). The Oxford Handbook of Musical Repatriation. The Ox-ford Handbook of Musical Repatriation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018
Haggan, M. (2004). Research paper titles in literature, linguis-tics and science: Dimensions of attraction. // Journal of Pragmatics. 36:2 (2004) 293–317. doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00090-0
Heuman, J. (2013). Unpacking the gift: negotiating property and custody in archival hardcore blogs. // Popular Music. 32:2 (2013) 177–195. doi: 10.1017/S026114301300010X
Hilder, T. R. (2012). Repatriation, Revival and Transmission: The Politics of a Sami Musical Heritage. // Ethnomusicolo-gy Forum. 21:2-SI (2012) 161–179. doi: 10.1080/17411912.2012.689473
Hill, C. G. (2017). Seeds as Ancestors, Seeds as Archives: Seed Sovereignty and the Politics of Repatriation to Native Peo-ples. // American Indian Culture and Research Journal. 41:3-SI (2017) 93–112. doi: 10.17953/aicrj.41.3.hill
Hill, M. R. (1993). Archival strategies and techniques. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage, 1993
Iacovino, L. (2010). Rethinking archival, ethical and legal fra-meworks for records of Indigenous Australian communi-ties: a participant relationship model of rights and respon-sibilities. // Archival Science. 10:4 (2010) 353–372. doi: 10.1007/s10502-010-9120-3
INRA. (2017). Cortext Manager - Cortext. Disponível em: https://www.cortext.net/projects/cortext-manager/. (acedido a 2019-11-08)
International Council on Archives. (1964). Elsevier’s lexicon of archive terminology?: French, English, German, Spanish, Italian, Dutch: comp. and arranged on a systematic basis. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1964
International Council on Archives. (1984). Dictionary of archi-val terminology?: English and French; with equivalents in Dutch, German, Italian, Russian, and Spanish. München: New York: K.G. Saur, 1984
International Council on Archives. (1995). The View of the Archival Community on the Settling of Disputed Claims: Position Paper Adopted by the Executive Committee of the International Council on Archives, Guangzhou, China, 10–13 April 1995. ICA/CIA. Disponível em: https://www.ica.org/sites/default/files/EB_1995_paper_archival-claims_EN.pdf. (acedido a 2019-11-08)
International Council on Archives. (2004). DAT III: Dictionary of archival terminology. Disponível em: https://internet.archivschule.uni-marburg.de/datiii/index.html. (acedido a 2019-11-08)
International Council on Archives. (2005). Reference Dossier on Archival Claims. // H. Bastien (Ed.). Proceedings of the twenty-nineth, thirtieh and thirty first International Confe-rence of the Round Table on Archives. Special Issue JANUS. Dordrecht 1998.
International Council on Archives. (2013). Multilingual Archi-val Terminology. Disponível em: http://www.ciscra.org/mat/mat. (acedido a 2019-11-08)
International Council on Archives. (2016). Basic Principles on the role of Archivists and Records Managers in support of Human Rights, International Council on Archives § (2016). Disponível em: https://www.ica.org/en/basic-principles-role-archivists-and-records-managers-support-human-rights. (acedido a 2019-11-08)
Jakubowski, A. (2015). State succession in cultural property. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015
Kahunde, S. (2012). Repatriating Archival Sound Recordings to Revive Traditions: The Role of the Klaus Wachsmann Re-cordings in the Revival of the Royal Music of Bunyoro-Kitara, Uganda. // Ethnomusicology Forum. 21:2-SI (2012) 197–219. doi: 10.1080/17411912.2012.689471
Karabinos, M. (2013). Displaced Archives, Displaced History: Recovering the Seized Archives of Indonesia. // Bijdragen tot de taal-. land- en volkenkunde / Journal of the Humani-ties and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia. 169:43499 (2013) 279–294. doi: 10.1163/22134379-12340027
Karabinos, M. (2015). The Djogdja Documenten: the Dutch-Indonesian relationship following independence through an archival lens. // Information e Culture. 50:3 (2015) 372–391. doi: 10.7560/IC50304
Karabinos, M. (2018). In the shadows of the continuum: testing the records continuum model through the Foreign and Commonwealth Office ‘Migrated Archives’. // Archival Science. 18:3 (2018) 207–224. doi: 10.1007/s10502-018-9292-9
Kecskeméti, C. (1977). Archival claims; preliminary study on the principles and criteria to be applied in negotiations (PGI-77/WS/1). Paris: UNESCO, 1977
Kecskeméti, C. (1985). Contested records - The Legal Status of National Archives. // UNESCO COURIER. :2 (1985) 9–11.
Kecskeméti, C. (1992). Displaced european archives - is it time for a postwar settlement. // The American Archivist. 55:1 (1992) 132–140.
Kila, J.; Balcells, M. (2015). Conclusion: Cultural Property Crime. // Kila, J.; Balcells, M. (eds.). Cultural property cri-me?: an overview and analysis on contemporary perspecti-ves and trends. Leiden?; Boston: Brill, 2015. 366–370
King, J. L. (1999). Cultural Property and National Sovereignty. // Messenger, P. M. (ed.). The ethics of collecting cultural property?: whose culture??: whose property? Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, 1999. 199-208
Kowalski, W. (2005). Types of Claims for Recovery of Lost Cultural Property. // Museum International. 57:4 (2005) 85–102. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0033.2005.00543.x
Kuprecht, K. (2016). Indigenous peoples’ cultural property claims. Cham: Springer, 2016
Lancefield, R. C. (1998). Musical Traces’ Retraceable Paths: The Repatriation of Recorded Sound. // Journal of Folklore Research. 35:1 (1998) 47–68. doi: 10.2307/3814785
Layton, R.; Thomas, J.; Stone, P. G. (2011). Introduction: the destruction and conservation of cultural property. Em Des-truction and conservation of cultural property (pp. 1–22). London: Routledge, 2011. 17-37
Levac, D.; Colquhoun, H.; O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. // Implementation Science. 5:69 (2010) 2–9. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
Leventhal, R. M.; Daniels, B. I. (2012). Orphaned Objects, Ethical Standards, and the Acquisition of Antiquities. // DePaul Journal of Art. Technology and Intellectual Property Law. 23: (2012) 339–361. Obtido de https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/dael23eid=363ediv=ecollection=
Lovering, T. (2009). Expatriate Archives. // Archives: The Journal of the British Records Association. 24:121 (2009) 1–5.
Lovering, T. (2017). Expatriate Archives Revisited. // Lowry, J. (ed.). Displaced Archives. New York: Routledge, 2017. 86–100
Lowry, J. (2017b). Introduction: displaced archives. // Lowry, J. (ed.), Displaced archives. London?; New York: Routled-ge, 2017. 1–10
Lowry, J. (2019). Radical empathy, the imaginary and affect in (post)colonial records: how to break out of international stalemates on displaced archives. // Archival Science. 19: (2019) 1–19. doi: 10.1007/s10502-019-09305-z
Lowry, J. (Ed.). (2017a). Displaced archives. London: Routled-ge, 2017
Maaba, B. B. (2008). Challenges to Repatriation and Preserva-tion of Tangible Heritage in South Africa: Black Art and the Experiences of the Ifa Lethu Foundation. // South African Historical Journal. 60:3 (2008) 500–513. doi: 10.1080/02582470802417557
Martín-Martín, A.; Orduna-Malea, E.; Thelwall, M.; López-Cózar, E. D. (2018). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. // Journal of Informetrics. 12:4 (2018) 1160–1177. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002
Mattern, E. (2016). A six-stage process for recovery of public records: replevin and the state of North Carolina. // Archi-val Science. 16:2 (2016) 195–212. doi: 10.1007/s10502-015-9241-9
Melamed, E. (2012). The fate of the archives of the Kiev Insti-tute of Jewish Proletarian Culture: puzzles and discoveries. // East European Jewish Affairs. 42:2 (2012) 99–110. doi: 10.1080/13501674.2012.699206
Merryman, J. H. (1994). The Nation and the Object. // Interna-tional Journal of Cultural Property. 3:1 (1994) 61–76. doi: 10.1017/S094073919400007X
Mnjama, N. M. (2007). A review of ESARBICA resolutions 1969-2005. // African Journal of Library. Archives and In-formation Science. 17:1 (2007) 23–32.
Montgomery, B. P. (2011). Immortality in the Secret Police Files: The Iraq Memory Foundation and the Baath Party Archive. // International Journal of Cultural Property. 18:3 (2011) 309–336. doi: 10.1017/S094073911100018X
Montgomery, B. P. (2013). Rescue or return: the fate of the Iraqi Jewish archive. // International Journal of Cultural Property. 20:2 (2013) 175–200. doi: 10.1017/S0940739113000040
Montgomery, B. P. (2014). US Seizure, Exploitation, and Resti-tution of Saddam Hussein’s Archive of Atrocity. // Journal of American Studies. 48:2 (2014) 559–593. doi: 10.1017/S0021875813002004
Montgomery, B. P. (2015). The Rape of Kuwait’s National Memory. // International Journal of Cultural Property. 22:1 (2015) 61–84. doi: 10.1017/S0940739115000053
Munn, Z.; Peters, M. D. J.; Stern, C.; Tufanaru, C.; McArthur, A.; Aromataris, E. (2018a). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. // BMC Medical Research Methodology. 18:143 (2018a) 2–7. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
Nagel, R. (Ed.). (1989). Dicionário de termos arquivísticos: subsídios para uma terminologia arquivística brasileira. Bonn?: Salvador: Deutsche Stiftung für internationale Entwicklung?: Universidade Federal da Bahia, 1989
Namhila, E. N. (2016). Content and use of colonial archives: an under-researched issue. // Archival Science. 16:2 (2016) 111–123. doi: 10.1007/s10502-014-9234-0
Nannyonga-Tamusuza, S.; Weintraub, A. N. (2012). The Au-dible Future: Reimagining the Role of Sound Archives and Sound Repatriation in Uganda. // Ethnomusicology. 56:2 (2012) 206–233.
Nemeth, E. (2014). Plunderer and Protector of Cultural Pro-perty: Security-Intelligence Services Shape the Strategic Va-lue of Art. // Nemeth, E. (ed.). Cultural security?: evaluating the power of culture in international affairs. London: Impe-rial College Press, 2014. 42
Ngoepe, M.; Netshakhuma, S. (2018). Archives in the tren-ches: repatriation of African National Congress liberation archives in diaspora to South Africa. // Archival Science. 18:1 (2018) 51–71. doi: 10.1007/s10502-018-9284-9
Niessen, J. P. (2018). Heritage and Repatriation in the History of Habsburg and Hungarian Archives. // Hungarian Cultu-ral Studies. 11: (2018) 136–143. doi: 10.5195/ahea.2018.327
Novic, E. (2016). The concept of cultural genocide?: an interna-tional law perspective. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2016
O’Keefe, R. (2006). The protection of cultural property in ar-med conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006
O’Neill, J. E. (1979). Replevin: A Public Archivist’s Perspecti-ve. // College e Research Libraries. 40:1 (1979) 26–30. doi: 10.5860/crl_40_01_26
Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., e Elmagarmid, A. (2016). Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic re-views. // Systematic Reviews, 5:1 (2016), 210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4. (acedido a 2019-11-08)
Pearce-Moses, R. (2005). A glossary of archival and records terminology. Chicago : Society of American Archivists, c2005
Pham, M. T.; Raji?, A.; Greig, J. D.; Sargeant, J. M.; Papadopou-los, A.; McEwen, S. A. (2014). A scoping review of sco-ping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. // Research Synthesis Methods. 5:4 (2014) 371–385. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1123
Phillips, D. (2016). The ‘Migrated Archives’ and a Forgotten Corner of Empire: The British Borneo Territories. // The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History. 44:6 (2016) 1001–1019. doi: 10.1080/03086534.2016.1251557
Porter, M. F. (1980). An algorithm for suffix stripping. // Pro-gram. 14:3 (1980) 130–137. doi: 10.1108/eb046814
Porter, M., e Boulton, R. (2002). Snowball. Disponível em: https://snowballstem.org/. (acedido a 2019-11-08)
Portugal. Ministério da Ciência Tecnologia e Ensino Superior. (2013). Renates - Registo Nacional de Teses e Dissertações. Disponível em: https://renates2.dgeec.mec.pt/. (acedido a 2019-11-08)
Punzalan, R. (2014). Understanding Virtual Reunification. // The Library Quarterly. 84:3 (2014) 294–323. doi: 10.1086/676489
R Core Team. (2013). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Disponível em: https://www.r-project.org/. (acedido a 2019-11-08)
Radeljic, B. (2015). Complete and Incomplete Archives: An Analysis of Archival Material Documenting European Community?Yugoslav Relations. // The Historian. 77:1 (2015) 80–99. doi: 10.1111/hisn.12057
Rawlings, G. (2015). Lost Files , Forgotten Papers and Colonial Disclosures?: The «Migrated Archives» and the Pacific , 1963 – 2013. // The Journal of Pacific History. 50:2 (2015) 189–212. doi: 10.1080/00223344.2015.1048585
Redman, T. (1979). The repatriation of Pound, 1939-1942: a view from the archives. // Paideuma: Modern and Contem-porary Poetry and Poetics. 8:3 (1979) 447–457.
Rhoads, J. (1966). Alienation and Thievery: Archival Problems. // The American Archivist. 29:2 (1966) 197–208. doi: 10.17723/aarc.29.2.510581828404555q
Ribeiro, F. (2011). A arquivística como disciplina aplicada no campo da ciência da informação. // Perspectivas em gestão e conhecimento. 1:1 (2011) 59–73. Obtido de http://periodicos.ufpb.br/index.php/pgc/article/view/9887
Ribeiro, F. (2013). La archivística como disciplina aplicada en el campo de la ciencia de la información (CI). // Códices. 9:1 (2013) 83–105. Obtido de http://eprints.rclis.org/19858
Ribeiro, F. A. (1998). O acesso à informação nos arquivos. Universidade do Porto. 1998
Robinson, H. (2012). Remembering things differently: mu-seums, libraries and archives as memory institutions and the implications for convergence. // Museum Management and Curatorship. 27:4 (2012) 413–429. doi: 10.1080/09647775.2012.720188
Sato, S. (2017). «Operation Legacy»: Britain’s Destruction and Concealment of Colonial Records Worldwide. // The Jour-nal of Imperial and Commonwealth History. 45:4 (2017) 697–719. doi: 10.1080/03086534.2017.1294256
Schenkolewski-Kroll, S. (2016). Jewish archives and archival documents: Israel and the Diaspora. // Archival Science. 16:3 (2016) 309–326. doi: 10.1007/s10502-015-9249-1
SCImago. (2019). SJR — SCImago Journal e Country Rank [Portal]. Disponível em: https://www.scimagojr.com/. (ace-dido a 2019-11-08)
Scovazzi, T. (2014). Repatriation and Restitution of Cultural Property: Relevant Rules of International Law. // Smith, C. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2014. 6318–6324
Sela, R. (2018a). «Imprisoned Photographs’’’: The Looted Archive of Photo Rissas (Rassas) - Ibrahim and Chalil (Khalil) Rissas». // Intermédialités.:32 (2018a). doi: 10.7202/1058469ar
Sela, R. (2018b). The Genealogy of Colonial Plunder and Era-sure - Israel’s Control over Palestinian Archives. // Social Semiotics. 28:2 (2018b) 201–229. doi: 10.1080/10350330.2017.1291140
Shepard, T. (2015). «Of Sovereignty»: Disputed Archives, «wholly Modern» Archives, and the Post-Decolonization French and Algerian Republics, 1962-2012. // American Historical Review.120:3 (2015) 869–883. doi: 10.1093/ahr/120.3.869
Silverman, H. (2011). Contested Cultural Heritage: A Selective Historiography. // Silverman H. (ed.). Contested Cultural Heritage. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2011. 1-49
Sinkoff, N. (2016). From the archives: Lucy S. Dawidowicz and the restitution of Jewish cultural property. // American Jewish History. 100:1 (2016) 117-147. doi: 10.1353/ajh.2016.0009
Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies?: research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). London?; Dunedin N.Z.: Zed Books, 2012
Spivak, G. C. (1999). A critique of postcolonial reason?: toward a history of the vanishing present. Cambridge, Mass.: Har-vard University Press, 1999
Stamatoudi, I. (2011). Cultural Property Law and Restitution. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011
Stoler, A. L. (2002). Colonial Archives and the Arts of Gover-nance. // Archival Science. 2: (2002) 87–109.
Stoler, A. L. (2008). Along the archival grain?: thinking through colonial ontologies. Princeton, N.J.; Woodstock: Princeton University Press, 2008
Stoler, A. L. (2009). Along the archival grain?: epistemic an-xieties and colonial common sense. Princeton University Press, 2009
Tas?delen, A. (2016). The return of cultural artefacts?: hard and soft law approaches. Cham: Springer International Publis-hing, 2016
Toman, J. (1996). The Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict: Commentary on the Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Ar-med Conflict and its Protocol, signed on 14 May 1954 in The Hague, and on other instruments of inter. Brookfield: Dartmouth Publishing Company, 1996
Treloyn, S.; Emberly, A. (2013). Sustaining Traditions: Ethnomusicological Collections, Access and Sustainability in Australia. // Musicology Australia. 35:2 (2013) 159–177. doi: 10.1080/08145857.2013.844473
Treloyn, S.; Martin, M. D.; Charles, R. G. (2016). Cultural precedents for the repatriation of legacy song records to communities of origin. // Australian Aboriginal Studies Journal. :2 (2016) 94–103.
Tricco, A. C.; Lillie, E.; Zarin, W.; O’Brien, K. K.; Colquhoun, H.; Levac, D.; Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explana-tion. // Annals of Internal Medicine. 169:7 (2018) 467–473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850
Trundle, C. (2011). Searching for Culpability in the Archives: Commonwealth Nuclear Test Veterans’ Claims for Com-pensation. // History and Anthropology. 22:4 (2011) 497–512. doi: 10.1080/02757206.2011.626773
Turku, H. (2018). Cultural Property as a Weapon of War. // The Destruction of Cultural Property as a Weapon of War. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. 1-25
UNESCO. (1954). Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict with Regulations for the Execution of the Convention, The Hague, 14 May 1954 (1954).. (acedido a 2019-11-08)
Vallier, J. (2010). Sound Archiving Close to Home: Why Com-munity Partnerships Matter. // Notes. 67:1 (2010) 39–49.
Ventresca, M. J.; Mohr, J. W. (2017). Archival Research Met-hods. // Baum, J. A. C. (ed.). The Blackwell Companion to Organizations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 2017. 805-828
Watkins, J. (2009). Cultural Nationalists, Internationalists, and “Intra-nationalists’’’: Who’s Right and Whose Right?”. // International Journal of Cultural Property. 12:1 (2009) 78–94. doi: doi.org/10.1017/S0940739105999992
Winn, S. R. (2015). Ethics of Access in Displaced Archives. // Provenance. Journal of the Society of Georgia Archivists. 33:1 (2015) 5.
Wurl, J. (2005). Documenting Displacement: The Migration of Archival Sources From Post-WW II East European Emigre Groups. // Archival Science. 5:1 (2005) 79–92. doi: 10.1007/s10502-005-5763-x
Zeidler, K. (2016). Restitution of Cultural Property: A Hard Case - Theory of Argumentation - Philosophy of Law. War-saw : Gdan?sk University Press, 2016.
Downloads
Publicado
2019-12-17
Como Citar
Ascensão de Macedo, L. S. “Arquivos Deslocados: Mapeamento De Literatura”. Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends, vol. 13, nº 4, dezembro de 2019, p. 5-34, doi:10.36311/1981-1640.2019.v13n4.02.p5.
Edição
Seção
Artigos
Licença
Ao submeter um artigo os autores mantêm os direitos autorais do mesmo, cedendo ao Brazilian Journal of Information Science plenos direitos para publicação do referido texto.
O (s) autor (es) concorda(m) que o artigo, se aceito editorialmente para publicação, deve ser licenciado sob a licença Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa /4.0) Os leitores / usuários são livres para: - Compartilhar - copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer meio ou formato - Adaptar - remixar, transformar e desenvolver o material para qualquer finalidade, mesmo comercialmente. O licenciante não pode revogar essas liberdades desde que você siga os termos da licença. Sob os seguintes termos: - Atribuição - Você deve dar o crédito apropriado, fornecer um link para a licença e indicar se foram feitas alterações. Você pode fazê-lo de qualquer maneira razoável, mas não de maneira que sugira que o licenciante endossa você ou seu uso. - ShareAlike - Se você remixar, transformar ou desenvolver o material, deverá distribuir suas contribuições sob a mesma licença que o original. Sem restrições adicionais - Você não pode aplicar termos legais ou medidas tecnológicas que restrinjam legalmente outras pessoas a fazer o que a licença permitir. Avisos: - Você não precisa cumprir a licença para elementos do material em domínio público ou nos casos em que seu uso é permitido por uma exceção ou limitação aplicável. - Não há garantias. A licença pode não fornecer todas as permissões necessárias para o uso pretendido. Por exemplo, outros direitos, como publicidade, privacidade ou direitos morais, podem limitar a maneira como você usa o material.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
